I am looking forward to this event next week. The title is not very descriptive of what I believe will be his presentation. I have heard Dr. Mohammed speak and was impressed with his message. As a practicing and educated Muslim he advocates a reformation of the religion. His message is that Islam as it is currently taught is incompatible with the rest of the world. He understands the origins of Anti-Semitism within the teaching of Islam and clearly presents the historic background.
Born in Guyana, South America, Dr. Khaleel Mohammed is an expert on both Judaism and Islam. He will present a fascinating lecture to a mixed Jewish, Muslim and Christian audience on a variety of topics centering on the representation of Judaism and Jews in the classical Islamic literature. Dr. Mohammed is unique in being accepted by both the Shia and Sunni sects of Islam and in the fact that, as an imam and scholar, he actively supports the cause of Israel.
Islam and Judaism - Can they co-exist?
Dr. Khaleel Mohammed
Saturday, January 29, 2005
7:30 p.m.
Temple Emanuel
1715 E. Fulton
Facilitators
Alli Metwalli and
Sheldon Kopperel
$10.00 in advance
$12.00 at the door
$5.00 for students
Sponsored by: Jewish Cultural Council – 616-942-5553
Dr. Khaleel Mohammed is professor of Religion at San Diego State University, and
a specialist in Islamic Studies. Dr. Mohammed was born in Guyana, South America
and is now a citizen of Canada. He has studied at both traditional and Islamic institutions
and Western Universities.
After a Bachelor’s degree in Religion and Psychology (Mexico), and a brief stint in
the Canadian Army, he received a Saudi government scholarship and studied at the
Kulliyat Shariah, Muhammad bin Saudi University, in Riyadh. On his return to
Canada, he received numerous fellowships and awards, completing an MA in Religion
(majoring in Judaism and Islam) at Concordia University, and then his Ph.D (Islamic
law) at McGill. From July 2001-August 2003, he was at Brandeis as that University’s
first Kraft-Hiatt postdoctoral fellow in Islamic Studies. His area of research was on
the imagery of the Jew in classical Islamic literature.
Dr. Mohammed has published books in Arabic and English as well as several articles
in scholarly journals. Dr. Mohammed is truly unique, since he is one of the few
Muslim scholars accepted by both the Sunni and Shia sects of Islam.
This note is from Dr. Mohammed's web site:
I have been bombarded with several queries regarding my "discussion" on frontpagemag.com, and the subsequent inimical web postings on Jihadwatch etc. Most of the queries have addressed my apparent silence in the face of attacks on my position regarding Islamic reformation, and my alleged lack of coming to terms with certain aspects of Islamic "truths."
I consider myself a scholar and therefore prefer to engage in discussion where facts, rather than fictions and prejudgments are presented. When therefore I am told that the pope apologized for the Crusades, or that Jihad only means war, or that I have to accept interpretations of the Quran that non-Muslims (with no good intentions or knowledge of Islam) seek to force upon me, I see a certain agendum developing: one that is based on hate, and I refuse to be part of such an intellectual crime.
There are certain stereotypes that extremists try to sell to the public: that all Arab countries are racist, closed to free discussion. I can only state that from my experience, I have encountered racism, anti-semitism, as well as free discussion in Arab countries--the same as I have encountered in the U.S. Indeed the hateful material that I have seen on the Internet has come largely NOT from the Arabs and Muslims (although they are not free from blame), but rather from hatemongers based right here in the United States.
One always has to ask the question Cui Bono? My position on the State of Israel has understandably gained the attention of many activists. The interests of some of these activists, however, as is manifest, have not been out of goodwill--rather they seek to get me to join them in their Islamophobia, Arabophobia, and latent Judeophobia. How can I view it otherwise when an evangelist proselytizer wants to tell me that all Muslims must belong to one of four sects--this means then that the Zaidis, the Ismailis, the Shias, the Ahmadis--to name just a few--are not Muslims? It means too that I-despite my declarations--am not Muslim, for I chose to identify with none of the medieval sectarian movements..I simply say that I am a Muslim.
In a discussion on Islam, I am told to "go back to my country." This presupposes that all Muslims are aliens--forgetting that the first Muslims in America were slaves--who did not come here out of their own free will. My position on Israel is free from any hidden motive: it is based on my reading of the Qur'an, one that I must admit places me at odds with many of my coreligionists. I certainly do not support Israel so that the in-gathering of the Jews can fulfill the parousia, and they be converted to Christianity. This to me is latent anti-semitism. Nor do I support a Jewish land in Israel so that I can convert Jews to Islam. This would be latent Judeophobia.
I have also been informed that I am now portrayed as a Jihadist by some since I refuse to apologize for Jihad in the Qur'an. I certainly refuse to apologize for Jihad--which is a defensive war fought against those who declare war on Islam. That many Muslim regimes have confused Jihad and War is something that I admit to--but their crime is their own, and I do not have to apologize for that--no more than I expect every Christian to apologize to every Muslim and every Jew for the crimes committed in the name of Jesus during the crusades.
I am also now informed that there is one website wherein I am quoted out of context. I am vilified for saying that I oppose Christian missionary activity in Saudi Arabia. This somehow has been taken to mean that I oppose democracy, women's rights etc. I don't see the connection: I think Saudi Arabia is a sovereign country, and has the right, in fact, the duty to its citizens to keep them from missionary activity if it so chooses. In the same article I mentioned that I am against both Muslim and Christian missionary activity--and this has been taken to suggest that I want the US to become a Muslim nation. Again, I don't see the connection. And I don't know of concerted Muslim missionary activity here in the US, except probably among the Nation of Islam's followers--who concentrate on the Black community. The Nation of Islam is made up of Americans, not immigrants, and their activity is their business.
What is particularly painful to me is that people who portray themselves as followers of religion should seek to shamelessly misquote and lie, eschewing all ethics in their calumny, because I do not agree with them. But as Jesus is supposed to have said: Ye shall know them by their fruits. (Matt 7.16).
I choose not to respond personally to certain slurs and insults because the error in the first place was mine: a professor of religion should not seek learned discussion with those whose views are clouded by faith. Fortunately for me, I am in the United States where, despite the actions of a minuscule few, this country happens to be a haven where, for the most part, the freedom of speech is something sacred. This does not give me the right to purvey hate on the Internet, or to engage in ad-hominem exchanges which say more about the people that sling them rather than those against whom their venom is directed. If anyone wishes to have up-front, honest dialog with me, with no hidden agenda or malice aforethought, I welcome this. Even if we disagree, at least, I would like to think that we can do so while granting respect to each other. At least we can live, if not in harmony, at least in a coexistence of tolerance.
Khaleel Mohammed.
Recent Comments